Family Conversations: The Relevance of Context in Evaluation Argumentation

Francesco Arcidiacono, Clotilde Pontecorvo, Sara Greco Morasso


This paper investigates how to reconstruct and evaluate argumentation in the context of Italian family conversations. By means of a case study, we show how understanding context is essential for the analytical reconstruction of argumentation. Within conversations at dinnertime, we rely on insights from Conversation and Discourse Analysis in order to interpret context-bound communicative and argumentative moves among family members. The analysis of the family exchange offers to us a view of how argumentation shapes the communicative practices occurring at dinnertime and how it can foster a critic 


argumentation; analytical reconstruction; family conversations; context; evaluation; socialization

Full Text:



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2009 Studies in Communication Sciences (SComS)

Studies in Communication Sciences | ISSN: 1424-4896