Fragmentary narrative reasoning. On the enthymematic structure of journalistic storytelling
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2018.01.012Keywords:
Storytelling, journalistic writing, , argumentation, narration, enthymemeAbstract
Journalists worldwide conceive of their work mostly as writing stories, because the narrative mode is extremely effective in delivering information to all social categories. Nonetheless, journalists hardly ever tell a whole story that complies with the criteria contemplated by narratology. Instead, they tell parts of a story and let the audience supply the rest, an operation made possible by the fact that narrative patterns are culturally shared by newswriters and their audiences. In this paper, we investigate some examples of fragmentary narratives as well as the journalists’ strategic reasons for using them, combining approaches to storytelling and to argumentation. The case studies are taken from Corriere del Ticino, the main Italian-language newspaper in Switzerland.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Marta Zampa, Daniel Perrin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The electronic contributions in the Internet are distributed under the "Creative Commons Attribution – ShareAlike" - License (CC BY-SA 4.0). Under the new license, anyone can use, distribute, and modify the content if they credit the original author and share any new creations under the same or compatible conditions. Here are the key features of the CC-BY-SA license:
- CC (Creative Commons): A globally recognized framework for licensing creative works.
- BY (Attribution): Requires acknowledgment of the author whenever the work is used.
- SA (ShareAlike): Ensures that adaptations of the work are distributed under the same or compatible licensing terms.